Article Date: Jan. 15, 2021. How successful were these legal actions? What mistakes did they make? How can we learn from this and improve? Are our lawyers that much better than this legal team? What distinguishes our current lawsuits from what was attempted then? What priority should the legal actions have compared to the other actions?
These are great questions Larry.. As a tiny part of an answer, it seems to me that the theory that Fuellmich provided needed a lot more activists to turn them into actual lawsuits.. We need specific victims, specific laws broken, and specific courts to file them in... and then people to put the names in the blanks and file them. Years have gone by, and through distractions, misinformation, infighting on our side, additional attacks on us, and the idea that "someone else is doing it" many have just not moved into actual lawsuits. It amazes me how VERY FEW people are actually even trying to take legal actions.
I became extremely disillusioned with the legal aspects after investing considerable time and watching them fail. My purpose is putting these things out here is to attempt to get discussion on improvements we can make at all levels that might improve our chances of success. And I just reviewed the following for additional ideas.
Hi Larry, I am reading, and re-reading, after reading the post for "My current best guess", it boils down to this:
""the 99% in the military and security agencies put the 1% in jail awaiting trials for their crimes against humanity."
Let's break that down more.
1. What laws were broken?
2. What courts do the trials occur in?
3. What if the judges are part of the 1%?
4. What if the juries are rigged?
5. What if the judge dismisses the cases?
6. What if the laws are written so poorly that it is unclear the that crimes were committed?
7. What if the legislatures refuse to fix the laws?
8. What if the legislatures change the laws, but the corrupt Governor vetoes it?
9. Since many elections are rigged, and the courts are rigged, why would going to a trial change anything?
10. How do we determine who to trust/who is the 1% benefiting ?
11. What if some were setup, used as patsies ?
12. Under what authority would they make an arrest?
It seems, if we can answer these questions it starts to look a lot like what our justice system is theoretically supposed to be:
1. Make Arrests, and/or
2. Go to Court
plus... there is no more authority in someone in the military to arrest or bring someone to court for crimes, as there is any other victim in society... so, we all can start trying... and some are...
The solution just boils down to using arrests and courts to get Justice.... despite our mostly broken justice system. there are a lot of questions on how to do that... but if we get off track from "arrests or courts"... then everything else seems to be a distraction.
MAKE AUSTRALIA HEALTHY AGAIN - LET'S MAKE OUR CHILDREN HEALTHY ONCE MORE - MAHA CLASS ACTION LODGED - IN THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL COURT - Let's make the Australian Government Accountable - https://makeaustraliahealthyagain.org/
Impressive looking Australian project. How viable is this? Can places like the US learn from this and implement similar projects? Are there similar projects in the US? Please share your views in the comments. https://sh1.sendinblue.com/altfqezv5xpfe.html?t=1666343378
May 13, 2023·edited May 13, 2023Liked by Time For Actions
Analysis of the Marvin German legal case (with permission to share as below) from an international lawyer who wants to remain anonymous (two emails):
<EMAIL 1>
"
Lar,
This is how I understand Marvin's case:
"it seems that the case against Marvin was dismissed and that the state must bear all costs of the trial. Marvin was not allowed to present any information to the court. Yet, this is one of four dismissals that Marvin has witnessed, all using this same strategy. Clearly, the courts are avoiding admitting the evidence that reveals the fraud of virology into public record."
So, there was no ruling or decision. The court simply avoided addressing the question of the existence of the virus, as a justification for the mask regulation. The court dismissed the case w/o accepting evidence and w/o giving reasons. In other words, the court ran away from addressing the underlying issue of the rationale or basis of the law.
By doing so, and the fact that the Prosecutor did not provide evidence that the virus exists according to Koch's Postulates, in effect, that there is a purified, isolated virus having the specific genome assigned to the 'virus', suggests that the virus or thing from which the regulation is based and supposedly seeks to protect the public from, does not exist. This means that there can be no pandemic of something that does not exist. The whole thing does not appears to be based on any real or identifiable pathogen.
Nat Sec Council has stated in their docs that increase in pop is a threat. So, if it's a threat, then conceivable that they create a weapon or weapons to combat the threat. The threat is life. The weapons are created to destroy life. The DoD, of which the NSC, is part of, simply contracted with bioweapons manufacturers, the pharma cos. In this case, the enemy is human life, in general, and the weapon is the injections. Of course, some of the injections are bioweapons, but others are just weapons.
If a German court runs when confronted with this question, I would surmise that other European courts would, too. Perhaps this is the kryptonite for all of the fines and incarcerations. There is no basis for any of them. The MAHA class action could, in effect, confirm Marvin's result, even though it is in another jurisdiction and another system of law. Germ law is based on a civil code, while Ozzie law is a common law system where previous court decisions, case law, can be used to support an argument.
Key evidence: "the judge summoned a witness, a police officer. She couldn’t remember anything". They had this planned. They needed a way out, so the cop mysteriously had a memory blank at the most inopportune time. The Prosecutor and the judge wanted a dismissal. They knew that they were being set up by Marvin.
The weapon in future cases is proof of the virus which forms the basis of the pandemic which is the reason for the 'health' measure or regulation. No judge wants to rule on whether the virus exists or not.
On the topic of lawsuits, maybe the recent possible breakthrough in Germany has some innovative ideas that might be of use? The following links, and many more, were sent to me from a friend who has experience as an international lawyer. He thinks they might have broken new ground and exposed some enemy weaknesses. I understand that no lawyers would take up the case, it had to be done by lay people. I understand that it succeeded, where many of the legal cases attempted by the best lawyers and legal teams failed (EG Fuelmich). Is this just a one off fluke or does it give insights into how legal actions might be improved to become more effective?
I will add this one too. Latest: Lockdown Lawsuits Update By Top International Lawyer, Reiner Fuellmich
https://www.europereloaded.com/latest-lockdown-lawsuits-update-by-top-international-lawyer-reiner-fuellmich/
Article Date: Jan. 15, 2021. How successful were these legal actions? What mistakes did they make? How can we learn from this and improve? Are our lawyers that much better than this legal team? What distinguishes our current lawsuits from what was attempted then? What priority should the legal actions have compared to the other actions?
These are great questions Larry.. As a tiny part of an answer, it seems to me that the theory that Fuellmich provided needed a lot more activists to turn them into actual lawsuits.. We need specific victims, specific laws broken, and specific courts to file them in... and then people to put the names in the blanks and file them. Years have gone by, and through distractions, misinformation, infighting on our side, additional attacks on us, and the idea that "someone else is doing it" many have just not moved into actual lawsuits. It amazes me how VERY FEW people are actually even trying to take legal actions.
This information could be important in legal procedures. https://rumble.com/v2mbo8c-david-martin-eu-parliament-international-covid-summit-may-3-2023-coronaviru.html
I became extremely disillusioned with the legal aspects after investing considerable time and watching them fail. My purpose is putting these things out here is to attempt to get discussion on improvements we can make at all levels that might improve our chances of success. And I just reviewed the following for additional ideas.
https://www.europereloaded.com/france-the-hunt-for-elected-officials-is-on/
https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/an-open-invitation-for-readers-to
Focusing on Addendum, Plan B, and the associated comments.
https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/my-current-best-guess-at-the-best
How can we use full spectrum actions, using both positive and negative reinforcement, for all of the obstacles we will encounter?
Hi Larry, I am reading, and re-reading, after reading the post for "My current best guess", it boils down to this:
""the 99% in the military and security agencies put the 1% in jail awaiting trials for their crimes against humanity."
Let's break that down more.
1. What laws were broken?
2. What courts do the trials occur in?
3. What if the judges are part of the 1%?
4. What if the juries are rigged?
5. What if the judge dismisses the cases?
6. What if the laws are written so poorly that it is unclear the that crimes were committed?
7. What if the legislatures refuse to fix the laws?
8. What if the legislatures change the laws, but the corrupt Governor vetoes it?
9. Since many elections are rigged, and the courts are rigged, why would going to a trial change anything?
10. How do we determine who to trust/who is the 1% benefiting ?
11. What if some were setup, used as patsies ?
12. Under what authority would they make an arrest?
It seems, if we can answer these questions it starts to look a lot like what our justice system is theoretically supposed to be:
1. Make Arrests, and/or
2. Go to Court
plus... there is no more authority in someone in the military to arrest or bring someone to court for crimes, as there is any other victim in society... so, we all can start trying... and some are...
The solution just boils down to using arrests and courts to get Justice.... despite our mostly broken justice system. there are a lot of questions on how to do that... but if we get off track from "arrests or courts"... then everything else seems to be a distraction.
More links on lawsuits.
MAHA Federal Court Covid class action bolstered by German court upholding SARSCOV2 virus does not exist - https://cairnsnews.org/2023/05/09/maha-federal-court-covid-class-action-bolstered-by-german-court-upholding-sarscov2-virus-does-not-exist/
MAKE AUSTRALIA HEALTHY AGAIN - LET'S MAKE OUR CHILDREN HEALTHY ONCE MORE - MAHA CLASS ACTION LODGED - IN THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL COURT - Let's make the Australian Government Accountable - https://makeaustraliahealthyagain.org/
Impressive looking Australian project. How viable is this? Can places like the US learn from this and implement similar projects? Are there similar projects in the US? Please share your views in the comments. https://sh1.sendinblue.com/altfqezv5xpfe.html?t=1666343378
MARVIN HABERLAND SHARES RESULTS OF HIS COURT CASE AGAINST VIROLOGY IN GERMANY - https://truthcomestolight.com/marvin-haberland-shares-results-of-his-court-case-against-virology-in-germany/
BREAKING: Atty. Tom Renz Plays Audio Tape of Major Hospital System Admitting Patients Are Being Killed by CDC Protocol - "This is the first evidence of intent to murder and it will likely vitiate all contracts, Prep Act protective cover!" - LIONESS OF JUDAH MINISTRY - 5/15/2023 - https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/breaking-atty-tom-renz-plays-audio?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Analysis of the Marvin German legal case (with permission to share as below) from an international lawyer who wants to remain anonymous (two emails):
<EMAIL 1>
"
Lar,
This is how I understand Marvin's case:
"it seems that the case against Marvin was dismissed and that the state must bear all costs of the trial. Marvin was not allowed to present any information to the court. Yet, this is one of four dismissals that Marvin has witnessed, all using this same strategy. Clearly, the courts are avoiding admitting the evidence that reveals the fraud of virology into public record."
So, there was no ruling or decision. The court simply avoided addressing the question of the existence of the virus, as a justification for the mask regulation. The court dismissed the case w/o accepting evidence and w/o giving reasons. In other words, the court ran away from addressing the underlying issue of the rationale or basis of the law.
By doing so, and the fact that the Prosecutor did not provide evidence that the virus exists according to Koch's Postulates, in effect, that there is a purified, isolated virus having the specific genome assigned to the 'virus', suggests that the virus or thing from which the regulation is based and supposedly seeks to protect the public from, does not exist. This means that there can be no pandemic of something that does not exist. The whole thing does not appears to be based on any real or identifiable pathogen.
Nat Sec Council has stated in their docs that increase in pop is a threat. So, if it's a threat, then conceivable that they create a weapon or weapons to combat the threat. The threat is life. The weapons are created to destroy life. The DoD, of which the NSC, is part of, simply contracted with bioweapons manufacturers, the pharma cos. In this case, the enemy is human life, in general, and the weapon is the injections. Of course, some of the injections are bioweapons, but others are just weapons.
If a German court runs when confronted with this question, I would surmise that other European courts would, too. Perhaps this is the kryptonite for all of the fines and incarcerations. There is no basis for any of them. The MAHA class action could, in effect, confirm Marvin's result, even though it is in another jurisdiction and another system of law. Germ law is based on a civil code, while Ozzie law is a common law system where previous court decisions, case law, can be used to support an argument.
"
<EMAIL 2>
"
https://truthcomestolight.com/marvin-haberland-shares-results-of-his-court-case-against-virology-in-germany/
Key evidence: "the judge summoned a witness, a police officer. She couldn’t remember anything". They had this planned. They needed a way out, so the cop mysteriously had a memory blank at the most inopportune time. The Prosecutor and the judge wanted a dismissal. They knew that they were being set up by Marvin.
The weapon in future cases is proof of the virus which forms the basis of the pandemic which is the reason for the 'health' measure or regulation. No judge wants to rule on whether the virus exists or not.
"
Landmark class action lawsuits further expose startling corruption in COVID vaccine rollout - Class action lawsuits in Australia and the UK over the COVID shots are now getting started, so hopefully it’s only a matter of time before that house of cards comes crashing down, but that doesn’t mean we’re out of harm’s way yet. - https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/landmark-class-action-lawsuits-further-expose-startling-corruption-in-covid-vaccine-rollout/
On the topic of lawsuits, maybe the recent possible breakthrough in Germany has some innovative ideas that might be of use? The following links, and many more, were sent to me from a friend who has experience as an international lawyer. He thinks they might have broken new ground and exposed some enemy weaknesses. I understand that no lawyers would take up the case, it had to be done by lay people. I understand that it succeeded, where many of the legal cases attempted by the best lawyers and legal teams failed (EG Fuelmich). Is this just a one off fluke or does it give insights into how legal actions might be improved to become more effective?
MAHA Federal Court Covid class action bolstered by German court upholding SARSCOV2 virus does not exist - https://cairnsnews.org/2023/05/09/maha-federal-court-covid-class-action-bolstered-by-german-court-upholding-sarscov2-virus-does-not-exist/
MARVIN HABERLAND SHARES RESULTS OF HIS COURT CASE AGAINST VIROLOGY IN GERMANY - https://truthcomestolight.com/marvin-haberland-shares-results-of-his-court-case-against-virology-in-germany/