ACTION/COUNTER : Interact with alternate viewpoints in online forums

A template/example for creating posts of one per action/solution idea. Initial idea based on https://solutionseeking.substack.com/

Short Title:

ACTION/COUNTER: Interact with others of various opinions in online forums

Long Title:

Seek vocal or engaging comments in online forums, chats, discussions and use logic, facts, evidence, and persistence to shut down their argument. Many times they do not realize they are adding to tyranny.

Reward:

• These misguided and opinionated posters can have multiplying effects, and therefore shutting down their tyrannical ideas and misinformation can have long lasting returns.

• We are moving people toward being “awake, motivated, and focused on productive actions”

  • move someone from “brainwashed by lies” to “partially awake”

  • move someone from “partially awake” to “ awake”

  • move from “awake, but distracted” to “awake, focused on productive actions”

  • move from “awake, but unproductive” to “awake, productive actions”

Pros:

• Can be done anytime, from anywhere

• Is public, so can have multiplying impact, by encouraging others to do the same

• A counter-offense instead of just defense or prepping

Options:

• Can be on right-leaning website (ex; Gateway Pundit) - or left-leaning sites (if you can find any anymore that allow comments)

• Reading the news anyway …. stay an extra few minutes to add a comment.

Required Resources:

Just time, and patience, and an public email address active online chat/forum accounts

Cons:

• Takes up time, requires patience.

• May have only limited impact

Risks:

• Potential time drain.

• More public info given to our enemies

Suggested Tactics for those who are close:

• It is easy to win over people who believe that Q or Trump will save us.

  • “We need everyone getting a lot more involved”

  • “There is no one person that can save us. Trump had 4 years and the swamp grew!”

  • “There are only 2 sides, and I am sure we are on the same side”

Suggested Tactics for those far away:

• Find common ground with opposing opinions.. usually it is along the lines of anti-big-corporations.. or that Trump is not a savior

  • “Is voting integrity a thing we should strive for or ignore?”

  • “Do we want more fraud or less fraud ?”

  • “If, in a alternate reality, the shots were killing people, how would we know?”

• Return their own lines back to them to show their hypocrisy.

• Ask them questions to get them to think for themselves

• Ask them if they value American values

• Ask if they want justice

• Use this line : "We are in a war.. The sides are Tyranny vs WeThePeople"

• Ask them to provide evidence, and provide them with our evidence

• Never, never, never let them get the last word, unless their last word is in agreement

  • nah... .even then, say something like “Cool!” to rub in their defeat

• Tell them that "I am glad we agree now that ...."

• only if in context: Tell them it is evil like them that make us all look better and justify why we need to keep up our fight.

• Go to drudgereport.com to find more sites

• Avoid the word “you” - no matter how it is used, it is confrontational.

• Avoid the word “not” - it confuses people. state things in the affirmative instead.

  • ex: This post is NOT an elephant…. so???? A true statement, sure.. but is it relevant ? not usually. :) ie: whatever is “not” is usually irrelevant.

Failed Tactics :

• Avoid calling names, unless they are already calling names. If so, work the names they call back at them in logical ways

• Avoid Trigger words

Wins:

• In one case a particular evil/satanic poster completely deleted their entire disqus account after I told him how he makes us all look justified

Losses:

• Some people never learn or are paid somehow to continue fighting no matter what logic or reason is given to them. Even when they agree, they are still arguing.

Overall Ratings (1-10):

Time For Actions : 7

Add a rating in the comments, please.